Allowed

Mohd. Sameer v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Civil Secy. Lko.

Allahabad HC11 Sept 2024A482/8152/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order on an application under Section 482 CrPC dealt with the submission of sureties and a personal bond. The High Court, following an Apex Court judgment, directed the lower court to accept a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties for the three pending cases.

What did the court decide?

Directing the lower court to execute a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 and accept two sureties of similar amount in place of higher cash bail.

Mohd. Sameer vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home)… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:62647

¶2

Court No. - 13

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8152 of 2024 Applicant :- Mohd. Sameer Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Civil Secy. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mahesh Singh Yadav,Suresh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶6

The instant application , has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and one personal bond for all three cases from the applicant and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the court below.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all three cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the applicant is very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant in District Lucknow are as follows:-

¶8

(i) Case Crime No. 0158 of 2024 Under Section 379 & 411 IPC, Police Station-GRP,

¶9

(ii) Case Crime Number 0161/2024 under section 379 & 411 I.P.C. Police Station-GRP

¶10

(iii) Crime Number 0136/2024 under section 379 & 411 I.P.C. Police Station-GRP Charbagh,

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P.

¶12

Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit.

¶13

In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases.

¶14

Order Date :- 11.9.2024

¶15

Jyoti/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohd. Sameer v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Civil Secy. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Sameer v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Civil Secy. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kallu Rawat @ Lallan and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Ravindra Kumar Tyagi and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Om Prakash and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Anuj Alias Anuj Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Mohd. Faruk Siddiqui @ Mohd. Faruk and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secy. Lko. and Another

Mamta Tripathi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and and Another