Disposed

Kallu Rawat @ Lallan and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC10 Sept 2024A482/8067/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application to quash criminal proceedings pending verification of compromise. Court discharged application without deciding merits, directing parties to file verified compromise before Trial Court within four weeks and stayed coercive action for eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed; parties to file verified compromise before Trial Court within four weeks; no coercive action for eight weeks.

Kallu Rawat @ Lallan and Another vs State… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:62229

¶2

Court No. - 13

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8067 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Kallu Rawat @ Lallan And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Sri Sudhir Kumar, Advocate, has put in appearance for the private opposite party no. 2 and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶8

Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s)/petitioner(s) for quashing criminal proceedings of ST No. 447 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No. 167 of 2018, under Section 308, 504, 506 IPC, P.S.-Tikait Nagar, District-Barabanki as well as Charge Sheet dated 08.07.2018 including summoning order dated 01.01.2019.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed.

¶10

Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:-

¶12

(i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned Court within four week's from today.

¶13

(ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record.

¶14

(iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order.

¶15

(iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed.

¶16

(v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶17

(vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned Court.

¶18

(vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case.

¶19

Order Date :- 10.9.2024 Vinay/-

¶20

Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Kallu Rawat @ Lallan and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kallu Rawat @ Lallan and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Raviendra Bahadur Singh Vs State U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secretariat Lko. and Another

Durga Prasad Verma @ Durga Prasad Vs State of U.P. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko and Another

Rajendra Kumar Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Another

Chandan Alias Dhananjay Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home , Lko. and Another

Sanjeev Kumar Singh and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Monu Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 4 Others