State of U.P. v. Himanshu Kumar and another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5649 of 2024
Applicant :- State of U.P. Opposite Party :- Himanshu Kumar And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jai Krishna Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
With
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2289 of 2024
Applicant :- Himanshu Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Raghav Dev Garg,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. P. C. Srivastava, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. J.K. Upadhyay along with Mr. A.K. Sand, learned Additional Advocate General for applicant in Criminal Misc. Application under Section 482 CrPC No.5649 of 2024; Mr. Manish Tiwary, learned senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Raghav Dev Garg along with Mr. S.S. Sisodia, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State in Criminal Misc. Application under Section 482 CrPC No.2289 of 2024.
Order reserved.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State of U.P.
- respondent
Himanshu Kumar
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/5649/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court