applicant and when she came back, then the staff-nurse informed her about the alleged incident of quarrel between the opp. party No. 2 and staff-nurse, however, no such incident of quarrel etc. had happened with the applicant, however, after the discharge of the wife of the opp. party No. 2 on 27.01.2017, the opp. party No. 2 with mala fide intention to teach a lesson to the applicant and only with the intention to falsely implicate her in a criminal case, with the intention to blackmail her for some financial benefit, on 10.03.2017, i.e. after two months of the discharge of wife, filed the present complaint case, on totally baseless story. The Police submitted its report that no such incident took place, as alleged in the complaint. The policereport is annexed as Annexure-5, however, the learned Magistrate, without considering these aspects of the matter, passed the impugned order, summoning the applicant to face trial under Section 506, I.P.C. in a cursory manner, without application of judicial mind. Aggrieved by the impugned summoning order, the applicant preferred criminal revision before the learned trial court, which was also ultimately dismissed on 09.05.2024. The revisional court also did not consider the report of the police and genuineness of the case and only relied on the plaint as well as the summoning order and rejected the revision.
