This order records the acceptance of the High Court's request to refer the case to the Trial Court for verifying a compromise between parties pending before them.
Direction to parties to appear before the court below for verification of compromise; proceedings stayed till next listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41667 of 2024
Applicant :- Shahroon And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Surat Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
2.Office is directed to proceed accordingly and print the name of Sri Dharmendra Kumar, Advocate as counsel for the opposite party no.2.
admitted the factum of the compromise entered into between the parties and he has no objection, in case matter is referred before the court below for verification of compromise. It is further contended that in changed circumstances opposite party no. 2 is no longer inclined to prosecute the present applicant.
Order Date :- 4.12.2024 T.S.
Digitally signed by :- TRIBHUWAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the entire criminal proceeding should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. based on a compromise between parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahroon And 5 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Dinesh Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
