In an application under Section 482 CrPC, the applicant sought quashing of proceedings against him for alleged offences under Sections 310 and 124 IPC. The High Court noted the arguments of both parties but did not dispose of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:5051
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 406 of 2024
Applicant :- Diwakar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar,Ajay Deep Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
मप्राननश्रीय उच्चितम न्यप्रायप्रालय दप् र ाप्रा सतनदर ककमप ् र ा अस िं वतल बनपम सश ्रा ्री . बश ्री . आई ., (2021) 10 एससशसश ्री 773 ्री मन अविधिप् र ारत वविधधिक धसदप्रासिंतयों कके आलकोक मन शश्रीघ्रतप्रापसूविरक वनणर्थीत वकयप्रा जप्रायकेरप्रा।
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 18.1.2024 Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing proceedings should be allowed.
Whether the High Court should take cognizance of offences under Sections 310 IPC and 124 IPC.
Whether an application under Section 482 requires rigorous adherence to the procedure laid down under Section 379 CrPC.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ankit Sharma, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMAAffirmed¶5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Diwakar Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
