Dr. Gayas Ahmad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In this application under Section 482 CrPC, the applicant challenged the continued proceedings following his acquittal. The court held that no supplementary charges were ever framed against the applicant for continuing the offence and allowed the application.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 26.10.2021 quashed prospectively; proceedings under Sections 188, 269, 270 BNSS for the applicant to be closed.