Pradhan Ram v. State of U.P. and Another
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39397 of 2024
Applicant :- Pradhan Ram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Kumar Gautam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
- Heard Sri Ashutosh Tiwari, learned counsel for applicant and Sri P.P. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. for the State.
- The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 15.07.2022 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Complaint Case No.15134 of 2022 (Pappu Rajbhar Vs. Pradhan Ram), under Section 138 of N.I. Act, P.S. Jangipur, District Ghazipur.
- Learned counsel for applicant has submitted that applicant wants to settle the dispute with opposite party no.2 and he is ready to deposit reasonable amount as may be directed by this Court.
- Issue notice to opposite party no.2.
- Considering the aforesaid submission, the present matter is referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court Allahabad, subject to the condition that the applicant will deposit a sum of Rs.1,55,000/- within two weeks from today with the Mediation Centre out of which Rs.1,50,000/- shall be paid to opposite party no.2 on his appearance before the Mediation Centre on a date to be fixed by the mediation center. Balance Rs.5,000/shall be retained by the mediation center towards its expenses.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pradhan Ram
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Pappu Rajbhar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/39397/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court