Dinesh Sonkar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCA482/38438/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A Section 482 application was adjourned after counsel for opposite party no. 2 filed a memo of appearance and sought time. Notice copy to be served on opposite party's counsel; matter to be listed fresh.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 76
¶2
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38438 of 2024
¶3
Applicant :- Dinesh Sonkar And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Munna Tiwari,Shrinivas Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
¶5
- Sri Anil Kumar Pandey, learned Advocate has filed memo of appearance on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 which is taken on record.
¶6
- Office is directed to print the name of Sri Anil Kumar Pandey as counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
¶7
- On his request, case is adjourned for the day.
¶8
- Learned counsel for the applicants is directed to serve the copy of the notice upon the counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
¶9
- List this matter again as fresh on 29.11.2024 before appropriate Court.
¶10
- This matter shall not be treated as tied up or part heard with this Bench.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Dinesh Sonkar And 3 Others
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/38438/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court