Applicants sought quashing of a SC/ST Act complaint proceeding via Section 482 on grounds of an out-of-court compromise. Court directed parties to appear before the court below for compromise verification and report within two months; proceedings stayed till next listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35165 of 2024
Applicant :- Bablu Rayakwar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gunjan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
whether complainant/victim has received any compensation amount from the State under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 or not. If so received, same shall be made good and deposited/returned in Government exchequer. The court concerned shall call for a report from the concerned District Social Welfare Officer as to whether received compensation amount has been deposited/returned by the victim or not.
Order Date :- 21.10.2024 VR
Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under complaint case pending before Special Judge (SC & ST Act) can be quashed on basis of parties' compromise.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Bablu Rayakwar And 2 Others
State of U.P.
Balram Singh (Opposite Party No. 2)
Dinesh Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
