Ilmanaz @ Pinky v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In the interest of justice, the application under Section 482 CrPC was adjourned due to non-appearance. The matter was listed fresh for a later date.
In the interest of justice, the application under Section 482 CrPC was adjourned due to non-appearance. The matter was listed fresh for a later date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 34001 of 2024
Applicant :- Ilmanaz @ Pinky Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deepanshu Jadon,Shubham Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Order Date :- 9.12.2024 Suraj Srivastav
Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ilmanaz @ Pinky
State of U.P.
Dinesh Pathak
Suraj Srivastav
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court