Rinku and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings alleging cheating and financial fraud, the High Court directed the trial court to decide an application to recall the arrest order expeditiously. No coercive action or proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. are permitted for 25 days or until such an application is filed. The court also barred repetitive exemption applications.
What did the court decide?
No coercive action or proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. for 25 days; trial court to decide recall application expeditiously; repetitive exemption applications barred.