Kartik Khosla v. State of U.P. and Another
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:154632
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
(Sl No.9)
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 31175 of 2024
Applicant :- Kartik Khosla Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bed Kant Mishra,Neetu Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. Heard Sri Siddhartha Agarwal, Advocate who proposes to appear on behalf of the applicant and has filed his Vakalatnana, on behalf of the applicant in the instant case and Sri Uday Bhan, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the charge-sheet dated 19.07.2022 and summoning order dated 26.11.2022 in Case No. 257461 of 2022, under Section 354, 392, 506, 384, 411 I.P.C. arising out of Case Crime No. 0077 of 2022, P.S.- Swaroop Nagar, District- Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of learned Chief Metropolitican Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kartik Khosla
Coram
Anish Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/31175/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court