The High Court disposed of an application seeking quashing of proceedings due to a lack of evidence connecting the alleged land to a grandfather's 1966 lease, noting that leases are not inheritable. The court directed expeditious consideration of a future bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:25073
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2633 of 2024
Applicant :- Mangal Singh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Vaibhav Upadhyay,Devendra Kumar,Mohd. Shahid Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
filed a suit under Section 229B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act in the court of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lucknow, which is still pending.
Order Date :- 21.3.2024 Pradeep/-
Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings should be allowed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I.Referred¶13
Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mangal Singh and 2 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
