Asgar Ali v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 application; time granted to file supplementary affidavit on whether applicant operated the company account mentioned in the FIR; matter listed fresh.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25642 of 2024
Applicant :- Asgar Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file supplementary affidavit explaining as to whether the applicant operated any account of the company as mentioned in the first information report.
List on 17.01.2025 as fresh.
Order Date :- 12.12.2024 AKT
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Asgar Ali
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/25642/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court