Disposed

Nadish Veig and Another v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC25 Jul 2024A482/23651/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought quashing of matrimonial case proceedings based on alleged compromise. Court directed parties to file verified compromise application before the concerned Civil Court within two weeks before allowing quashing. No coercive action pending.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action to be taken against applicants till date; applicants directed to file verified compromise before concerned court within two weeks.

Nadish Veig and Another vs State of Up and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 76

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23651 of 2024

¶3

Applicant :- Nadish Veig And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

¶5

Sri Shubham Kumar, Advocate has filed short counter affidavit along with his Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant/opposite party no.2, in Court today, which are taken on record.

¶6

Heard Sri Ashish Goyal, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Shubham Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2/informant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶7

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings, including cognizance order dated 07.03.2024, of Case No.3997 of 2024 (State vs. Nadish Veig and Others), arising out of Case Crime No.113 of 2023, under Sections - 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Section - 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station - Mahila Thana, District - Agra, pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.), Fast Track Court, Court No.1, Agra, in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that on account of intervention of the well-wishers, a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and the said compromise will be filed before the court concerned within two weeks from today. It is further contended that proceedings of the aforesaid case may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the

¶9

parties.

¶10

Whether a compromise has taken place or not, can best be ascertained by the court where the proceedings are pending, after ensuring the presence of the parties before it.

¶11

In view of the aforesaid it is directed that in case the parties file an appropriate application for compromise before the court concerned within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be verified by the court concerned in accordance with law and if the said compromise is verified, the same shall be made part of the record and report to that effect will be prepared and the parties would be allowed to obtain certified copy thereof and file the same before this Court by the next date.

¶12

List this case on 04.09.2024, showing the name of Sri Shubham Kumar, as counsel for the informant/opposite party no.2.

¶13

Till the next date of listing, no coercive action would be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶14

Order Date :- 25.7.2024 S Rawat

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nadish Veig and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nadish Veig and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Shweta Agarwal vs State of U.P. and Another

Anas Minor vs State of U.P.

Sanjay vs State of Up

Niyaz Ahmad vs State of Up and Another

Dilshad and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Mamta Behra Alias Shabnam vs State of U.P. and Another