Sanjeev Nayan Mishra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court refused a quash application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. notwithstanding the applicant's argument that no prima facie case existed. However, liberty was granted to file a discharge application before the trial court with specific interim directives regarding bail.
What did the court decide?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. refused; liberty granted to file discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. with interim bail directions.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:113410
Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22409 of 2024
Applicant :- Sanjeev Nayan Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajendra Prasad Tiwari,Vinay Kumar Tiwari,Vineet Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
- Heard Mr. Rajendra Prasad Tiwari, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State-opposite party-1.
- Perused the record.
- Applicant Sanjeev Nayan Mishra has approached this Court by means of present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the following prayer:
"It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the Crl. Misc. Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. and to quash the charge sheet no. 02/2024 dated 20.01.24 in Case Crime No. 05/2020, u/s 13 (1)B r/w 13 (2) Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, Police Station -U.P. Vigilance Establishment Meerut Sector Meerut and cognizance order dated 31.01.24 passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption, Meerut in Crl. Case No. 08/146/2024, State Vs. Sanjeev Nayan Mishra.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer to quash the charge sheet and stay proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is granted.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sanjeev Nayan Mishra
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/22409/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court