Dismissed

Parshuram Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Dec 2024A482/21672/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to challenge a maintenance order by a Family Court. Relying on Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 and precedent, the court held that maintenance orders are not interlocutory under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and the remedy available is revision.

What did the court decide?

Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed as not maintainable; liberty to file revision granted.

Parshuram Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another — Maintenance and Alimony | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:195512

¶2

Court No. - 75

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21672 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Parshuram Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

This application under Section - 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against order dated 13.04.2023, passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.3, Deoria in Case No. 635 of 2012 (Smt. Suman Sharma Vs. Parshuram Sharma), under Section - 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station - Gauri Bazar, District - Deoria, whereby maintenance has been granted in favour of opposite party no.2.

¶8

Perusal of record shows that by impugned order dated 13.04.2023, maintenance has been granted by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.3, Deoria in favour of opposite party no.2. In view of provisions of Section - 19 of Family Court Act, 1984 and the law laid down in case of Smt. Anjana Mukhopadhyay Vs. State of U.P. and Another 2023:AHC:2129445, Ashu Jain Vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others 2023:AHC:165660 and Manish Aggarwal Vs. Seema Aggarwal and Others 2012 SCC OnLine Del 4816, it is clear that an order of maintenance or interim maintenance passed by family court is not an interlocutory order and that against such orders, aggrieved person has remedy of revision. It was held that against such order,

¶9

application under Section - 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable. Similar law has been laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in case of Liaqat Hussain Vs. Jainab Praveen and Another AIRONLINE 2020 ALL 2497. In view of aforesaid, this application under Section - 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable.

¶10

Accordingly, this application under Section - 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not maintainable.

¶11

However, the applicant is at liberty to file revision/resort appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

¶12

The certified copy of order of family court may be returned back to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photocopy of the same on record.

¶13

Order Date :- 13.12.2024 S Rawat

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Parshuram Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parshuram Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudhir Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd Saeed and Others vs State of Up and Another

Jiyaulahak vs State of U.P. and Another

Bushra Anjum vs State of U.P. and Another

Chandrma Pratap and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Yogendra Pal Singh and Others vs State of U.P. and Another