Kamlesh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2159 of 2024
Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Singh Gaur,Sankalp Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Heard Shri Sankalp Agarwal, learned Counsel for the applicant, Shri Aatreya Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party.
Learned A.G.A. has accepted notice on behalf of State-opposite party No.1.
Let notice be issued to opposite party Nos.2 to 6 by R.P.A.D.
Steps to be taken within one week from today.
Learned A.G.A. as well as opposite party Nos.2 to 6 may file their counter affidavits within four weeks'. Two weeks' time thereafter shall be available to learned Counsel for the applicant for filing rejoinder affidavit.
Accordingly, list/put up this case on 30.04.2024 before appropriate Bench.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kamlesh Kumar
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/2159/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mohd. Faisal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others
Devraj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civiil Sectt. Lko.
Arvind Verma vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko.
Mohammad Miraj @ Meraj vs State of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others