The court dismissed the applicant's application under section 482 CrPC challenging proceedings for black marketing of rice. The court found the investigation revealed the applicant was personally involved in the offence despite the charge being in his father's name.
The application under section 482 CrPC was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:125888
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21103 of 2024
Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Tandon Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 2.8.2024 Anil K. Sharma
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application under section 482 CrPC is maintainable in proceedless against charges of black marketing and short selling of grains.
Whether the death of the father makes the case against the applicant who was actually conducting the affair of the shop devoid of merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arvind Kumar Singh
State of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
