Applicants sought quashing of a charge sheet and summoning order under Sections 147, 504, 506, 427 IPC via Section 482 Cr.P.C. The State objected that the application was filed after years of unexplained laches; counsel could not answer. The court found no ground to entertain it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:143903
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19094 of 2024
Applicant :- Chandrawati And 11 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Indra Dev Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
2. Perused the record.
urged by the learned A.G.A. that since the delay/laches in filing present application have not been sufficiently explained by applicants, therefore, present application is liable to be dismissed on the ground of laches/delay.
Order Date :- 4.9.2024 YK
Digitally signed by :- YASHWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the Section 482 Cr.P.C. application challenging the charge sheet, summoning order and proceedings be entertained despite delay of over four years in filing?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Chandrawati And 11 Others
State of U.P.
Another
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
