In an application under Section 482 CrPC, the Allahabad High Court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:155981
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18539 of 2024
Applicant :- Kamlesh Saroj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Hausala Prasad,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Case called out in revised list.
No one appears on behalf of applicant to press this application.
Learned A.G.A. for State opposite party 1 is present.
As no one appears on behalf of applicant to press this application, it is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 24.9.2024 HSM
Digitally signed by :- HARI SHANKER MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamlesh Saroj
State of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
Hari Shanker Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
