In an application under Section 482 CrPC filed in Court No. 77, the High Court noted the applicant's absence and directed them to explain the delay. The matter was set for re-hearing.
Directed the applicant to file a supplementary application explaining the delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18379 of 2024
Applicant :- Chhunnan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Kumar,Rabindra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Even in the revised call, none appears for the applicant, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Applicant is directed to file supplementary explaining the delay in filing the present application.
Put up as fresh on 11.04.2025.
Order Date :- 26.11.2024 Akram
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKRAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Chhunnan
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Mohammad Akram
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
