Gautam Rajpal v. State of Up and Another
Allahabad HCA482/15760/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC alleging a prior commercial transaction between the parties and disputing an allegation of breaking a mobile phone; court found some merit and issued notice to opposite party No.2 returnable at an early date, with steps within a week.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 74
¶2
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15760 of 2024
¶3
Applicant :- Gautam Rajpal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Chand Patel,Rayoof Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
¶5
- Heard Shri Neeraj Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Rayoof Ali and learned AGA for the State.
¶6
- I find merit in the argument of learned counsel for the applicant that not only there was a prior commercial transaction between the parties but the allegation of breaking a mobile phone of Rs. 20,000/- without disclosing its brand appears to be false.
¶7
- Issue notice to opposite party No.2 returnable at an early date.
¶8
- Steps be taken within a week.
¶9
- Dasti in addition.
¶10
- List on date fixed in notice at 03:30 PM.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Gautam Rajpal
- respondent
Opposite Party No.2
Coram
AI extract
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/15760/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Prashant Kumar
- Order 2 · Prashant Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court