Daya Shanakar Rao v. State of U.P. and Another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
(Sl No.3)
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11849 of 2024
Applicant :- Daya Shanakar Rao Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- K.K.Rao,Pradeep Kumar Srinette Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. Heard Mr. Mohd. Sohail, counsel holding brief of Sri K.K. Rao, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajiv Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. On 09.05.2024, the matter was adjourned on behalf of learned counsel for the applicant. The matter was again listed on 18.06.2024 but none appeared on behalf of the applicant.
3. Today also, adjournment is being sought on behalf of learned counsel for the applicant. Since, repeated adjournments are being sought on behalf of the applicant, therefore, there appears no urgency in the matter.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Daya Shanakar Rao
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Anish Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/11849/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court