Dilip Chaurasiya and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCA482/11394/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Applicants in a cross-version Section 482 application argued they lodged the earlier FIR which resulted in a charge-sheet, while the complainant filed a later 156(3) application. The court only issued notice to the opposite party with dasti service permitted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 74
¶2
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11394 of 2024
¶3
Applicant :- Dilip Chaurasiya And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
¶5
- Court considered the argument of Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants that present proceedings are cross-version whereas applicants' side promptly lodged an F.I.R. wherein after investigation, charge-sheet was filed on 20.6.2022 and alleged occurrence took place on 8.6.2022, whereas complainant in the present case has filed an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. thereafter on 4.7.2022.
¶6
- Issue notice to the Opposite Party No.2 returnable at an early date.
¶7
- Steps be taken within ten days.
¶8
- In addition to normal mode of service, dasti service is also permitted.
¶9
- List on the date fixed in the notice.
¶10
Order Date :- 5.9.2024 SB
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Dilip Chaurasiya and 3 Others
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No.2
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/11394/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
- Order 2 · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court