Disposed

Ranjeet Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC10 Dec 2024A482/11199/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court directed the applicants to deposit Rs. 30,000 before the Mediation Centre, listed mediation proceedings, and stayed all coercive actions pending the outcome of mediation in a criminal case arising from a matrimonial dispute.

What did the court decide?

Applicants directed to deposit Rs. 30,000 for mediation; coercive action stayed until the next listing.

Ranjeet Yadav and 2 Others vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 28

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11199 of 2024

¶3

Applicant :- Ranjeet Yadav And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Tripathi,Mukesh Kumar Sharma,Sabhajeet Rai

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The applicants in the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C are seeking quashing of the proceeding of Case No. 102577 of 2024, State v. Ranjeet Yadav & ors., arising out of F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0097 of 2023, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Lucknow, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. Crime against women, Lucknow, including the summoning order dated 22.10.2024 passed in the said case.

¶8

Submission of learned counsel for the applicants is that the matter relates to matrimonial dispute and the applicants have all the intentions to settle the same amicably. Applicants' counsel strenuously urged that this case may be referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court so that the couple may have a chance to settle their dispute on their own terms through mediation.

¶9

The Court is also satisfied on the basis of the record and the submissions made before it that the nature of litigation is such that there is a chance to resolve the matter through process of mediation and an attempt ought to be made to explore that possibility.

¶10

Accordingly, the applicants are directed to deposit Rs. 30,000.00 (Thirty thousand only) within two weeks before the Mediation Center.

¶11

List this case on 09.01.2025 . On that date, the opp. party No. 2 will appear before this court for giving her consent whether she is ready for mediation or not.

¶12

The question of releasing the amount in favour of the opp. party No. 2 will be considered, in case she is ready and willing for participating in mediatio proceedings.

¶13

Till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken

¶14

against the applicants in the proceedings arising out of F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0097 of 2023, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Lucknow .

¶15

( Brij Raj Singh, J. )

¶16

Order Date :- 10.12.2024 A.Nigam

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ranjeet Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Raman Sahni vs State of U.P. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko

M/S Humara India Credit Cooperative Society Lmt. Thru. Its Dir. Dhananjay Subramanium and 3 Others vs the Directorate of Enforcement (Ed) Deptt. of Revenue Thru. Direct. and 3 Others

Yagya Prakash Tripathi @ Vinod Kumar and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Sheetla Sahai vs State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Lko

Mo. Raja @ Ali Raja @ Raja vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Farook Alias Farook Khan vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Others