Kamlesh Kumar v. State of Up and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment granted in an application under Section 482 on the ground that the applicant's counsel is unwell.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10880 of 2024
Applicant :- Kamlesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Avdhesh Narayan Tiwari,G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
On the matter being taken up, a request for adjournment has been prayed by Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Sushil Kumar, the learned counsel for applicant, on the ground that the learned counsel for applicant is undergoing dialysis.
Order sheet shows that this is first adjournment prayed on behalf of learned counsel for applicant.
In view of above, the hearing of the application is adjourned.
Matter shall re-appear as fresh on 2.9.2024.
Order Date :- 20.8.2024 Arshad
Digitally signed by :- ARSHAD MAHMOOD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kamlesh Kumar
- respondent
State Of Up
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/10880/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court