Disposed

Faujdar @ Faujdar Rambali Jaiswar v. Nayab Tahsildar Tahsil Kadipur Distt. Sultanpur and Another

Allahabad HC11 Jan 2024A227/87/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the petition under Article 227 by directing the Respondent to decide the pending mutation case expeditiously within three months, after hearing parties, without examining merits or granting unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to Respondent to decide pending mutation case expeditiously within three months after affording opportunity of hearing.

Faujdar @ Faujdar Rambali Jaiswar vs Nayab Tahsildar… — Landlord and Tenant | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:2949

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 87 of 2024 Petitioner :- Faujdar @ Faujdar Rambali Jaiswar Respondent :- Nayab Tahsildar Tahsil Kadipur Distt. Sultanpur And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Misra,Anoop Kumar,Mohd. Khurshid Akhtar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶5

Heard.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with.

¶7

The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:-

¶8

"Issue an Order or Direction to the opposite party No. 1 to decide the mutation case of the petitioner registered as Case No.T201804680402900 (Faujdar and Others Versus Ramnath) under Section 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 (U.P. Act No. 8 of 2012), as amended by U.P. Ordinance No. 4 of 2015 within a stipulated period as early as possible."

¶9

In view of the settled principles of law that mutation proceedings being summary in nature, should preferably be decided expeditiously and the case in issue is pending since long, this Court is of the view that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending.

¶10

Accordingly the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.-1 to consider and decide the pending proceedings of Mutation case in Case No.T201804680402900 (Faujdar and Others Versus Ramnath), most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed before it, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.

¶11

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶12

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 11.1.2024 Jyoti/-

¶14

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Faujdar @ Faujdar Rambali Jaiswar v. Nayab Tahsildar Tahsil Kadipur Distt. Sultanpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Faujdar @ Faujdar Rambali Jaiswar v. Nayab Tahsildar Tahsil Kadipur Distt. Sultanpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Keval Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bahraich and Others

Reeta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 2 Others

Shiv Shyam Tiwari Vs Tahsildaar Milkipur Dist Ayodhya and Another

Gayatri Singh U/a 227 Vs Board of Revenue Thu Member Judicial Lucknow and 4 Ors.

Faujdar @ Faujdar Rambali Jaiswar Vs Nayab Tahsildar Tahsil Kadipur Distt. Sultanpur and Another

Shiv Dutt Vs Naib Tehsildar Jagdishpur Tehsil Musafirkhana Mandal Ayodhya Amethi and 2 Others