Disposed

Rahil @ Langra Thru. Brother Ishmail v. State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC22 Feb 2024A227/868/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 227, the High Court directed the trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties to satisfy bail conditions for the petitioner across four criminal cases, relying on a Supreme Court principle.

What did the court decide?

Directed the trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties to satisfy bail conditions in all four cases mentioned.

Rahil @ Langra Thru. Brother Ishmail vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:15868

¶2

Court No. - 16

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 868 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Rahil @ Langra Thru. Brother Ishmail Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the state and perused the record.

¶7

This instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the learned trial court to release the petitioner by excepting only two sureties and not to insist the petitioner to file separate surety bonds in each and every four cases and as mentioned in the petition.

¶8

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in four criminal cases and has been granted bail by the competent courts, the details of cases are as under ;-

¶9

Case Crime No.205 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 457 I.P.C., Police Station Asiyana, District Lucknow.

¶10

Case Crime No.215 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 457 I.P.C., Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow.

¶11

Case Crime No.73 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 457 I.P.C., Police Station Cantt, District Lucknow.

¶12

Case Crime No.80 of 2023, under Sections 380, 411, 457 I.P.C., Police Station Cantt, District Lucknow.

¶13

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner belongs to a very poor family so he is unable to manage 08 persons for surety before the learned trial court.

¶14

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in special leave to appeal Criminal No.8914- 8915 of 2018 Hani Nishad alias Mohd. Imran alias Viccky vs. State of U.P. and Others had directed that the applicant who was an accused in 31 cases be released on bail

¶15

taking one personal bond and two sureties.

¶16

A prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner be also given the benefit of judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad (supra).

¶17

This writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the learned trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in one criminal case against the petitioner and such personal bond and sureties shall hold good in all the four cases in which the petitioner has been granted bail.

¶18

Order Date :- 22.2.2024 Saurabh

¶19

Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rahil @ Langra Thru. Brother Ishmail v. State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahil @ Langra Thru. Brother Ishmail v. State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Himanshu Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow and 2 Others

Hari Prasad Vs State of U.P.

Sweety Prajapati Vs State of U.P. and Ors.

Karan Pathak Vs State of U.P.

Irshad Alam Beg Vs State of U.P.

Sakshi Thru. Her Husband Amit Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others