Disposed

Kalawati and Another v. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Room No. 15 Sultanpur and Another

Allahabad HC9 Feb 2024A227/636/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 227, the petitioner sought a direction to expedite the disposal of Original Suit No.1078 of 2020. The single judge held that the petition could not be entertained at such an early stage of proceedings. The matter was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a specific application for expediting the suit before the concerned court.

What did the court decide?

The petition disposed of, not disposed of under the Application for expediting the proceedings of the pending case before the court concerned filed in application. the court shall pass appropriate ord

Kalawati and Another vs Civil Judge (Senior… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:12081

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 636 of 2024 Petitioner :- Kalawati And Another Respondent :- Civil Judge (Senior Division), Room No. 15 Sultanpur And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar

¶4

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶6

In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the privaterespondents is hereby dispensed with.

¶7

By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following main relief:-

¶8

"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the opposite party No.1 i.e. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Room No.15 Sultanpur to expeditiously decide the Original Suit No.1078 of 2020 (Siyaraji Versus Amar Nath and another) pending before opposite party No.1, according to law within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court."

¶9

The present petition has been filed for expeditious disposal of pending Original Suit No.1078 of 2020 (Siyaraji Versus Amar Nath and another), which was filed in the year 2020, as such, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to decide the suit, in issue, at an early stage of proceedings. As such, the present petition for the main relief sought, at this stage, is not liable to be entertained. In this regard, reference can be made to the judgments passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the cases of Km. Shobha Bose v. Judge Small Causes & Ors., 2011 (88) ALR 850 and Ali Shad Usmani & Ors. v. Ali Isteba & Ors. 2015 (109) ALR 513 .

¶10

After considering the case of the petitioner in the light of the parameters laid down by this Court in the cases of Km. Shobha Bose (Supra) and Ali Shad Usmani (supra), this Court is of the view that no direction, at this stage, can be issued to the court concerned to decide the above mentioned suit within the certain time frame.

¶11

In view of above, the relief, as prayed for in this petition, cannot be granted at this stage. As such, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for expediting the proceedings of the pending case before the court concerned and in case, such an application is moved, then the court concerned shall pass appropriate orders on the same within reasonable time in accordance with law.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority/Court concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶13

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 9.2.2024/Jyoti/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Kalawati and Another v. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Room No. 15 Sultanpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalawati and Another v. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Room No. 15 Sultanpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kariya Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. and 16 Others

Sri Prakash Tiwari Vs Tahsildar Tahsil- Tulsipur Distt. Balrampur and Another

Ram Pal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and 7 Others

Shyam Lal and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko. and 13 Others

Rajesh Kumar Rathour Vs Mukesh and 5 Others

Brahmanand Vs Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman and Others