Disposed

Lal Singh v. Board of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Its Chairman and 9 Others

Allahabad HC20 Dec 2024A227/6300/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed respondent to dispose of a pending review application under U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act and Tendency Act expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Directions to consider and decide the review application under Rule 339 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act read with Section 273, U.P. Tendency Act expeditiously without unnecessary adjournment.

Lal Singh vs Board of Revenue U.P. Lko… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:85866

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6300 of 2024 Petitioner :- Lal Singh Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Its Chairman And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Tiwari,Suraj Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos.4 to 14 is dispensed with.

¶7

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Review Application bearing No.REW/2751/2021, Computerized Case No.R20211117002751, under Rule 339 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act read with Section 273, U.P. Tendency Act pending before respondent No.1.

¶8

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the aforesaid case has not yet been decided.

¶9

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the Review application bearing No.REW/2751/2021, Computerized Case No.R20211117002751, under Rule 339 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act read with Section 273, U.P. Tendency Act as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶11

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the respondent No.1 shall decide the aforesaid case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.

¶12

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of . Order Date :- 20.12.2024 Ashutosh

¶13

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Lal Singh v. Board of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Its Chairman and 9 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lal Singh v. Board of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Its Chairman and 9 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Radha and Another vs Sri Anil Kumar, Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Labour, Govt. of U.P. Lko. and Another

Pankaj Singh vs Presiding Officer, Labor Court, A.P. Sen Road, Lko. and 3 Others

Shiv Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 4 Others

Deep Narayan Tiwari vs U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, through its Managing Director/ Chairman, Lucknow and Others

M/s Gupta Automobiles, through its partner Ram Shanker Gupta vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited, through its General Manager (Operations), and 2 Others

Atul Kumar Singh @ Atul Rai vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.