Ram Anuj v. Tehsildar Tehsil Patti Distt. Pratapgarh and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-paragraph listing order in a habeas writ regarding mutation pendency. No adjudication rendered; case listed for further hearing on 09.01.2025.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6197 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ram Anuj Respondent :- Tehsildar Tehsil Patti Distt. Pratapgarh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Misra,Amulya Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite party no. 1 who is granted two weeks' time to obtain instructions in this matter particularly with regard to reason for pendency of mutation proceedings for the past 40 years.
List this case on 09.01.2025, as fresh.
Order Date :- 18.12.2024 Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ram Anuj
- respondent
Tehsildar Tehsil Patti Distt. Pratapgarh
Coram
Manish Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- A227/6197/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rajbahadur Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko.
Ram Niwas Gupta and 2 Others vs M/S Mintifi Finserve Private Limited, Times Square, Mumbai
National Highways Authority of India Piu Lucknow Thru Project Director vs Babu Lal and Ors.
Jag Prasad Sharma and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Chairman Board of Revenue Lko. and 13 Others