Petitioner sought expedite direction for disposal of his long-pending revenue case before the Board of Revenue. The court, without examining merits, directed respondent No.1 to decide the proceedings most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing and without unnecessary adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:78732
Court No. - 8
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5681 of 2024
Petitioner :- Bal Govind Respondent :- Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow Thru. Member And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faiz Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.
In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 to 10 is dispensed with.
By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case No.R-200819460034024, Case No.3074/2007-2008, Triyogi Narayan Vs. Bal Govind, which is pending before the respondent No.1.
It is urged that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided.
Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.
Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending proceedings of Case No.R200819460034024, Case No.3074/2007-2008, Triyogi Narayan Vs. Bal Govind most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of the petitioner on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .
Order Date :- 27.11.2024 ank
Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Board of Revenue should be directed to expeditiously decide pending Case No.R-200819460034024, Case No.3074/2007-2008 (Triyogi Narayan Vs. Bal Govind)?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bal Govind
Board Of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow Thru. Member
Triyogi Narayan
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
