The High Court, in a writ matter under Article 226, noted the petitioner's filed copy of a pending criminal case and directed the counsel to explain the same during the next hearing.
The counsel for the petitioner is directed to explain the pending criminal case history.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5629 of 2024
Petitioner :- Vijay Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Mahendra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 26.11.2024 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
The petitioner failed to explain a pending criminal case against him while filing the writ petition.
The court directed the counsel to explain the pending criminal history.
Vijay Singh
State of U.P.
Another
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
