Disposed

Ganga Ram v. the Learned Court of Tehsildar, Tehsil Mankapur, Gonda and Another

Allahabad HC4 Oct 2024A227/4826/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a public interest matter under Article 227, the Allahabad High Court directed the Tehsildar to decide a pending mutation case expeditiously within six months, ensuring full hearing opportunities without unnecessary adjournments, while expressly reserving the authority to decide on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Tehsildar to decide Mutation Case No.1217 of 2016 expeditiously within six months.

Ganga Ram vs the Learned Court of Tehsildar, Tehsil… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:68703

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4826 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Ganga Ram Respondent :- The Learned Court Of Tehsildar, Tehsil Mankapur, Gonda And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgesh Kumar Singh,Ashutosh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.2 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Mutation Case No.1217 of 2016; Computerized Case no.T20160830071217 (Shyama vs Ramdeen) filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶9

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1/Tehsildar Mankapur, Tehsil Mankapur, District-Gonda to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Mutation Case No.1217 of 2016; Computerized Case no.T20160830071217 (Shyama vs Ramdeen) most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of six months from the date an authenticated copy of this order is placed before the authority concerned.

¶11

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶12

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 4.10.2024

¶14

Harshita

¶15

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ganga Ram v. the Learned Court of Tehsildar, Tehsil Mankapur, Gonda and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganga Ram v. the Learned Court of Tehsildar, Tehsil Mankapur, Gonda and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

C/M Ram Dular Ram Bahal Maurya Siksha Prasar Samiti Thru Its Manager Prem Prakash Maurya vs Deputy Registrar Firms Societies and Chits Ayodhya Division Ayodhya and 3 Others

M/s Sainik Infrastructure India Private Limited Thru. M.D. Radha Krishna Singh vs Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Singh

Baba Gyan Chandra Das vs Add. Commissioner (Adm. ) Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and 4 Others

Faruki Mohamadabrar Abdulsatar vs Nayab Tahsildar, Tehsil Kunda, Pratapgarh and Others

Jashoda and Another vs Tahsildar ,Tehsil-Kunda, Distt. Pratapgarh and 2 Others

Siya Ram vs Addl. Commissioner, Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and Others