Petition under Article 227 dismissed as infructuous on the admission of the counsel for the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:146988
Court No. - 87
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4802 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt. Nazama Parveen And 2 Others Respondent :- Nadeem Rao Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Shukla
Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
At the very outset, Mr. Piyush Pandey, holding brief of Sri Dharmendra Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that this petition has now become infructuous and same may be dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the above statement of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 10.9.2024
Monika
Digitally signed by :- MONIKA KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Nazama Parveen And 2 Others
Nadeem Rao
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
