Petitioner challenged orders refusing adjournment and quashing under Article 227. The Court held that while delay contributed to the wife's non-appearance, there was no infirmity affecting justice, and the impugned orders were not unlawful or erroneous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:64663
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4432 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt. Pratima Gupta
Respondent :- The Addl. Prin. Judge -Viii, Family Court, Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Mukul Sudhir Pandey,Shashank Dwivedi,Soma Pandey
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
2 ककी चविदयान अधधिविकया स श ुश्री ससोमया पयासंडकेय कसो सशुनया रथया पतयाविलश्री कया अविलसोकन चकयया।
आदकेश चदनयासंक 20.05.2023 मम यह असंचकर हवै चक घरकेलमू चह स ंया सके मचहलयाओसं कया ससंरकण अधधिचनयम कके अन्रग र पयाररर आदकेश चदनयासंक 07.12.2019 दयारया ययाचचिकयाकरर्ती कसो रु 15,000/- प्रचर मयाह भरण-पसोषण ककी धिनरयाचश दश्री जिया रहश्री हवै। उन्हहोंनके यह भश्री कहया चक चविपकश्री नके आदकेश चदनयासंक 20.05.2023 कके अगलके हश्री चदन चदनयासंक 21.05.2023 कसो चविपकश्री नके टमडर दयारया रु० 20,000/- एकम श ुर धिनरयाचश रथया अगलश्री चियार चरधथयहों कके धलए रु० 500/- प्रचर चरधथ कके चहसयाब सके रु० 2000/- अथया कशुल रु० 22,000/- पयाररवियाररक न्ययाययालय जिमया कर चदए थके रथया ययाचचिकयाकरयार कके चविदयान अधधिविकया कया कथन चक चविपकश्री नके ययाचचिकयाकरर्ती कसो कसोई धिनरयाचश अदया नहहीं ककी, असत्य हवै।
और प्रचक्रियया मम अवियासंचछर चविलम्ब कयाररर कररश्री रहश्री। प्रचरपरश्रीकण न करनके कके ससंबसंधि मम ययाचचिकयाकरर्ती नके प्रयाथरनया पत (ग-32) एविसं (ग-40) मम अलग-अलग आधियार कहके, धजिससके यह प् र श् र ी हसोरया हवै चक ययाचचिकयाकरर्ती नके अपनके प्रयाथरनया पत मम चमथ्यया कथन चकयया हवै।
Order Date :- 19.9.2024 Himanshu
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere under Article 227 when the Family Court was slow to complete matrimonial proceedings due to the petitioner's multiple court achievements over almost 9 years.
Whether the petitioner's failure to participate actively or pay court fees constitutes condonation for dismissal.
Whether the Family Court incorrectly rejected the petitioner's petitions seeking quashing of orders and substitution of lawyers.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Pratima Gupta
The Addl. Prin. Judge-Viii, Family Court, Lko.
Another
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
