Disposed

Smt. Ranjana Devi v. Tahsildar, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh and Others

Allahabad HC9 Sept 2024A227/4299/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an Article 227 petition seeking expedited disposal of a land revenue case pending before the Tahsildar. The single judge directed the respondent to decide the case expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent Tahsildar to decide pending Case No.7972/2024 most expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments.

Smt. Ranjana Devi vs Tahsildar, Tahsil… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:61822

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4299 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Smt. Ranjana Devi Respondent :- Tahsildar, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 and 3 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Case No.7972/2024, Computerized Case No.T202402570107972, under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶9

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the case has not yet been decided.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending Case No.7972/2024, Computerized Case No.T202402570107972 most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.

¶13

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 9.9.2024 Rakesh/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Ranjana Devi v. Tahsildar, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Ranjana Devi v. Tahsildar, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Lavkush Vs State of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Amethi and Others

Tamheed Fatima Vs State of U.P., Thru. Chief Secy., Revenue and Ors.

Nattha @ Natthu Vs Village Panchayat Humayupur, Pargana and Tehsil Ramkot, Sitapur Thru. Secy.

Anshika Bajpai vs Akhilesh Tiwari

Ram Sumer vs Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil Kunda, Pratapgarh and Others

Harishchandra Singh vs State of U.P Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lucknow and Others