Disposed

Phool Jahan v. Tehsildar Judicial Salon Distt. Raebareli and Another

Allahabad HC6 Sept 2024A227/4279/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Under Article 227, the Court directed the Tehsildar to expeditiously decide a pending Mutation Application under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within six months, without examining the merits of the parties' case.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent No.1/Tehsildar to decide the pending Mutation Application as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months.

Phool Jahan vs Tehsildar Judicial Salon Distt… — Landlord and Tenant | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:61481

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4279 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Phool Jahan Respondent :- Tehsildar Judicial Salon Distt. Raebareli And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Balak Ram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.2 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Mutation Application no.T202310580600453 (Phool Jahan vs Hafija @ Hfeeja & another) filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.2.

¶9

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1/Tehsildar, Judicial, Salon Tehsil Salon District Raebareli to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Mutation Application no.T202310580600453 (Phool Jahan vs Hafija @ Hfeeja & another) as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of six months from the date an authenticated copy of this order is placed before the authority concerned.

¶11

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶12

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 6.9.2024

¶14

Harshita

¶15

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Phool Jahan v. Tehsildar Judicial Salon Distt. Raebareli and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Phool Jahan v. Tehsildar Judicial Salon Distt. Raebareli and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Renu Tiwari and Others Vs Additional Commissioner Judicial, Lucknow Mandal, Lucknow and Others

Ram Kishor and Others. Vs D.D.C.and Others.

Vijay Shankar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Sheetla Baksh Singh vs Deputy Director of Consolidation District Gonda and 4 Others

Tamheed Fatima vs State of U.P., Thru. Chief Secy., Revenue and Ors.

Nattha @ Natthu vs Village Panchayat Humayupur, Pargana and Tehsil Ramkot, Sitapur Thru. Secy.