Petitioner sought a direction under Article 227 for the Family Court to expedite a mutual consent divorce suit. The court held no ground for interference as the statutory six-month period had elapsed before the hearing was fixed, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:59964
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4172 of 2024
Petitioner :- Priya Srivastava Respondent :- Gaurav Srivastava Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajey Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
[Subhash Vidyarthi,J.]
Order Date :- 2.9.2024
-Amit K-
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue a direction to the Family Court to decide the mutual consent divorce suit expeditiously.
If statutory grounds exist for Supreme Court's interference in the Family Court's timeline for the next hearing.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Priya Srivastava
Gaurav Srivastava
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
