Disposed

Ram Bux and Another v. Learned Addl. Commissioner (Judicial)-I, Lucknow and Others

Allahabad HC1 Aug 2024A227/3571/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposed of a petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of a land reform case. The Court directed the respondent to decide the pending case expeditiously, affording a full hearing but without unnecessary adjournments, without examining merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to consider and decide the pending case expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments, affording full opportunity of hearing.

Ram Bux and Another vs Learned Addl. Commissioner… — Land Acquisition | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:52469

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3571 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Ram Bux And Another Respondent :- Learned Addl. Commissioner (Judicial)-I, Lucknow And Others

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Sharma,Kafiya,Madhavendra Nath Misra,Smt.Anita Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey

¶6

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent No.4.

¶8

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents No.2 and 3 is dispensed with.

¶9

By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of Case No.00062/2019, Computerized Case No.201910000000062, under Section 331(3) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶10

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the case has not yet been decided.

¶11

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending Case No.00062/2019, Computerized Case No.201910000000062 most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditious as possible.

¶13

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.

¶14

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 1.8.2024 Rakesh/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ram Bux and Another v. Learned Addl. Commissioner (Judicial)-I, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bux and Another v. Learned Addl. Commissioner (Judicial)-I, Lucknow and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bhagwan Deen and Anr. Vs Shyam Sunder and 6 Ors.

Rajjan Lal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Indra Bahadur Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief Secy., Revenue, Lucknow and Others

Smt. Premlata vs Addil. Commissioner Judicial, Lucknow Division, Lucknow and Others

Ramanand vs State of U.P. Thru. Colector/ District Magistrate, Amethi and Others

Jas Karan vs State of U.P. Thru. Collector / District Magistrate, Sultanpur and Others