Partly allowed

Nagesh Chandra Pathak v. Smt. Neelam

Allahabad HC23 Jul 2024A227/3318/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction to lower court for speedy disposal of a pending recall application regarding dismissal of summons cases. Court granted liberty to file urgency application without examining merits of the main case.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of with liberty to move an urgency application for early disposal of the recall application before the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No. I Lucknow.

Nagesh Chandra Pathak vs Smt. Neelam — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:49360

¶2

Court No. - 19

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3318 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Nagesh Chandra Pathak Respondent :- Smt. Neelam Counsel for Petitioner : - Vishwanath Pratap Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶6

Heard.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has been preferred for issuing a direction to the respondent no.- Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No. I Lucknow to decide the recall application dated 2.2.22023, which is registered as Misc. Case No. 158 of 2023 (Nagesh Chandra Pathak Vs. Smt. Leela), for recall of the order dated 6.10.2022 by which regular suit no. 710 of 2010 filed by the petitioner under Section Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was dismissed for want prosecution, within the time as specified by this Court. The said recall application is pending for the last more than one and half years.

¶8

On being asked from the learned counsel for the petitioner whether petitioner has preferred any urgency application for early disposal of the aforesaid recall application/misc case, learned counsel for the petitioner has replied that no such application has been preferred before the Court concerned and petitioner has approached this Court directly for deciding the case expeditiously.

¶9

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the aforesaid recall application/misc. case before the Court concerned and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner the same may be decided by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No. 9 Lucknow within the stipulated time fix by this Court.

¶10

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency

¶12

application for early disposal of aforesaid recall application/misc case before the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No. I Lucknow If any such application is preferred, it is expected that Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No.I Lucknow shall decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner looking into the urgency mentioned therein expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in case there is no legal impediment and if any adjournment is unavoidable only short adjournment may be given.

¶13

Order Date :- 23.7.2024 Anuj Singh

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Nagesh Chandra Pathak v. Smt. Neelam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagesh Chandra Pathak v. Smt. Neelam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Patan Vs Civil Judge (Senior Division) Distt. Bahraich and Another

Sai Sahai Singh @ Sai Shay Singh Vs Civil Judge (Jd) North, Room No. 25, Sultanpur and Another

Diwakar Yadav Vs Addl. Prin. Judge Family Court Lko. and Another

Simpal Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and 2 Others

Nagesh Chandra Pathak Vs Smt. Neelam

Ram Sewak Yadav Vs Addl. Prin. Judge Family Court No. 1 Gonda and 2 Others