Disposed

Anil Kumar v. Civil Judge (J.D) Sultanpur and 6 Others

Allahabad HC8 Jul 2024A227/3102/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition under Article 227 granting liberty to the petitioner to file an urgency application in the regular suit, directing the trial court to decide it expeditiously if preferred. No merits were examined.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to petitioner to file urgency application; respondent to decide it expeditiously after hearing.

Anil Kumar vs Civil Judge (J.D) Sultanpur… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:46073

¶2

Court No. - 19

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3102 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Respondent :- Civil Judge (J.D) Sultanpur And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar,Surendra Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶6

Heard.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has been preferred for issuing a direction to the respondent no. 1, the Civil Judge (Junior Division) South Room No. 24, Sultanpur to decide the application under Section 39 Rule 1 &2 C.P.C. filed by the petitioner in the Regular Suit No. 1041 of 2022 (Anil Kumar Vs. Sumitra Devi & others) pending since 14.7.2022 within the time as specified by this Court.

¶8

On being asked from the learned counsel for the petitioner whether petitioner has preferred any urgency application for early disposal of the application filed in the regular suit, learned counsel for the petitioner has replied that no such application has been preferred before the Court concerned and petitioner has approached this Court directly for deciding the case expeditiously.

¶9

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the application filed in the regular suit before the Court concerned and if any such application is preferred by the petitioner the same may be decided by the respondent no.1 within the stipulated time fix by this Court.

¶10

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the application filed in the regular suit before the respondent no. 1. If any such application is preferred, it is expected that respondent no. 1 shall decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner looking into the urgency mentioned therein expeditiously in accordance with

¶12

law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without providing any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶13

Order Date :- 8.7.2024 Anuj Singh

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Anil Kumar v. Civil Judge (J.D) Sultanpur and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar v. Civil Judge (J.D) Sultanpur and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Chaudhary Jamadar Singh Mahila Mahavidyalaya Thru Secy. Vs State of U.P. Thru Principal Secretary/Commissioner and Ors.

Punjab National Bank Circle Office Gomti Nagar Lko.through Vs District Magistrate / Collector Lucknow and Another

Mohd. Deen Vs the State of U.P Thru Secy. Labour U.P and Ors.

Prabha vs State of Up and Another

Heeralal Verma @ Heeralal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 5 Others

Mohammad Khaliq Revenue Vs State of U.P.through Secy.Revenue and Finance Lko.and 3 O