Petition under Article 227 against U.P. Waqf Tribunal was withdrawn by counsel citing inadvertent omissions of facts and documents; the court dismissed it as not pressed with liberty to file fresh and directed return of certified copies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:46503
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3084 of 2024
Petitioner :- Samiuddeen @ Samiuddeen Nadavi Respondent :- U.P. Waqf Tribunal Lucknow Thru Registrar And Anr.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramendra Kumar
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to some inadvertent mistake, certain facts and documents are left to be mentioned/incorporated in the present writ petition which is necessary for proper adjudication of the present case and prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh.
As prayed, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh.
Office is directed to return the certified copies of the relevant documents annexed with the present writ petition and retain the photostat copies of the same.
Order Date :- 9.7.2024 Nitesh
Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Samiuddeen @ Samiuddeen Nadavi
U.P. Waqf Tribunal Lucknow Thru Registrar
Anr.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
