Petition under Article 227 challenging interlocutory proceedings; no one appeared even in the revised call, and the court found the interlocutory matter warranted no interference, so it dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:81678
Court No. - 7
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 29035 of 2018
Petitioner :- Devideen Respondent :- Addl. District Judge Court No.7 Gonda And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Sadhu Saran Shukla,Madhu Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Abhishek Kumar,Anupam Dwivedi,Snehil Shukla
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
None appears even in the revised call. Even otherwise, the proceedings arise out of interlocutory proceedings warranting no interference.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 4.12.2024 Lokesh Kumar
Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Devideen
Addl. District Judge Court No.7 Gonda And Ors.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
