The Allahabad High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 filed in 2016 for non-prosecution, noting the petitioner and counsel had lost interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:78750
Court No. - 12
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 28968 of 2016
Petitioner :- Shiv Nath Pal @ Ram Murat Pal Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru D.M Pratapgarh And Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Puttu Lal Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A,Devi Prasad Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
Order Date :- 27.11.2024 Anand/-
Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shiv Nath Pal @ Ram Murat Pal
State Of U.P Thru D.M Pratapgarh And Ors
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
