Dismissed

Surjeet Kumar v. the Court of Learned Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division)Court No. 30 Distt. Sultanpur and 2 Others

Allahabad HC1 May 2024A227/2169/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking expeditious disposal of an eight-year-old civil suit. The court declined further judicial intervention due to existing administrative directions but granted liberty to apply for urgency to the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner given liberty to move an application detailing urgency before the trial court for expeditious disposal.

Surjeet Kumar vs the Court of Learned Addl… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:33872

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2169 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Surjeet Kumar

¶5

Respondent :- The Court Of Learned Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division)Court No. 30 Distt. Sultanpur And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vyas Narayan Shukla

¶6

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶7

Heard Sri Vyas Narayan Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶8

In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

¶9

By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Original Suit No. 919/2015 (Shiv Pati Vs. Ram Pati) pending before Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Court No. 30, District - Sultanpur

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Balrampur, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

¶11

In this regard, it is noteworthy, that this Court on administrative side has already issued directions to the Courts below to obtain zero pendency of cases which are more than five years old. In view of directions already issued on administrative side, this Court is not inclined to pass any further order on judicial side. Hence, the prayer is rejected.

¶12

However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditiously disposal of the suit before the trial court. In case, such application is moved within two weeks from today the trial court shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, say, within three weeks thereafter. In case, the trial court is prima facie satisfied that a case for urgency is made out it shall pass suitable order thereon.

¶13

With aforesaid observation and direction the petition stands disposed of.

¶14

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶15

Order Date :- 1.5.2024/Ravi/

¶16

Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Surjeet Kumar v. the Court of Learned Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division)Court No. 30 Distt. Sultanpur and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surjeet Kumar v. the Court of Learned Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division)Court No. 30 Distt. Sultanpur and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ramdev Vs Civil Judge Junior Division Kunda Pratapgarh and Another

Maya Devi Vs Civil Judge Jr Division Distt. Bahraich and Another

Anuj Kumar @ Rahul Vs Learned District Judge/Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal,Sultanpur and 3 Others

Bhallar Vs Addl.Commissioner and Others

Satya Prakash and Others 2 Vs Commissioner Faizabad and Others 4

Brij Mohan Tewari Vs Addl. Commissionr J Faizabad and Others