Disposed

Chhedi Alias Chhedi Prasad Yadav v. Addil. Commissioner Judicial Ayodhya Mandal and 8 Others

Allahabad HC19 Apr 2024A227/1900/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This methers petition under Article 227 sought a direction for the Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, to decide a pending appeal within a stipulated time and without unnecessary adjournments, as per the relevant Revenue Code provisions. The court disposed of the petition in favour of the petitioner without examining the merits of the underlying appeal.

What did the court decide?

The respondent Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division is directed to decide Appeal No. 1591/2022 within a stipulated period under Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, after giving

Chhedi Alias Chhedi Prasad Yadav vs Addil… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:30706

¶2

Court No. - 18

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1900 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Chhedi Alias Chhedi Prasad Yadav Respondent :- Addil. Commissioner Judicial Ayodhya Mandal And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record of the case.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the present writ petition has been preferred for issuing direction to the respondent no. 1/Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the Appeal No. 1591/2022, filed under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 "Rambahadur vs. Chedi and Ors.", which is pending since the month of September, 2022, within a stipulated time as this Hon'ble Court may fix.

¶8

It is further submitted that as per Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, it is provided that the appellate court shall, endevour to finally decide the appeal within a period of six months from the date of filing of the appeal.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶10

On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of and it is expected that the respondent no. 1/Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya shall make an endeavour to decide the Appeal No. 1591/2022, filed under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 titled as "Rambahadur vs. Chedi and Ors.", which is pending since the month of September, 2022 in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a stipulated period as provided under Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 from the date of production/receipt of certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶11

Order Date :- 19.4.2024

¶12

Nitesh

¶13

Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Chhedi Alias Chhedi Prasad Yadav v. Addil. Commissioner Judicial Ayodhya Mandal and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhedi Alias Chhedi Prasad Yadav v. Addil. Commissioner Judicial Ayodhya Mandal and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Amir Alam Khan Vs Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, Lucknow and Others

Smt. Gulab Kali Vs the Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow and Others

Mansharam Vs Naib Tehsildar, Milkipur,, Tehsil Milkipur, Ayodhya and Others

Ram Kripal Vs Deputy Director of Consolidation Pratapgarh and Others

Ram Dular Vs D.D.C.

Chhedi Alias Chhedi Prasad Yadav Vs Addil. Commissioner Judicial Ayodhya Mandal and 8 Others