Dismissed

Rakesh Kumar v. Smt. Akansha Yadav

Allahabad HC8 Apr 2024A227/1715/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, dismissed the petitioner's petition under Article 227 seeking expedited disposal of a pending Suit for Dissolution of Marriage. Citing existing administrative directions to clear old pending cases, the Court held further judicial intervention unnecessary but granted liberty to approach the trial court with an urgent application.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; liberty granted to move appropriate application detailing urgency to the trial court within two weeks.

Rakesh Kumar vs Smt. Akansha Yadav — Allahabad HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:28384

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1715 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Respondent :- Smt. Akansha Yadav Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Yadav

¶5

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶7

In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Case No. 491 of 2022 (Rakesh Kumar Yadav Vs. Smt. Akanksha) under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act before Principal Judge, Family Court, District Faizabad.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case Principal Judge, Family Court, District Faizabad considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

¶10

In this regard, it is noteworthy, that this Court on administrative side has already issued directions to the Courts below to obtain zero pendency of cases which are more than five years old. In view of directions already issued on administrative side, this Court is not inclined to pass any further order on judicial side. Hence, the prayer is rejected.

¶11

However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditiously disposal of the suit before the trial court. In case, such application is moved within two weeks from today the trial court shall consider and decide the same expeditiously, say, within three weeks thereafter. In case, the trial court is prima facie satisfied that a case for interference is made out it shall pass suitable direction thereon.

¶12

With aforesaid observation and direction the petition stands disposed of.

¶13

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶14

Order Date :- 8.4.2024 RKM.

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rakesh Kumar v. Smt. Akansha Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Kumar v. Smt. Akansha Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Sangeeta Pandey and Another Vs Appellate Appointed Authority/Chief Judicial Magistrate,Gonda and 4 Others

Indu Agarwal and Another Vs U.P. State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission Thru. Chairman Lko. and 2 Others

Ram Kumar Maurya Vs Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No 25 Barabanki and 3 Others

Vikram Kashyap @ Vicky vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Deota Deen and Others Vs D.D.C.and Others

Lalta Prasad and Others Vs Ram Sumer and Others